Adam Marshall bill to transfer ownership of RFS fleet from councils to state government

Mr Marshall made the announcement on Monday, June 19, at the Kentucky RFS station alongside the region's mayors, who have put their support behind the NSW Rural Fires Amendment (Red Fleet) Bill 2023.

"The 'red fleet dispute' has been an ongoing debacle - a political football - over the last 12 months between the State Government and local councils over who own and pays for RFS assets," Mr Marshall said.

"My Bill will remedy the situation, bringing the argy-bargy to an end by making it clear that RFS assets belong to, and should be accounted for by, the State Government, via the NSW Rural Fire Service."

READ ALSO:

He said this will bring the treatment of all these items in line with how the vehicle and building assets of all other emergency services in NSW are accounted for and remove an enormous and ridiculous cost burden from our local councils.

"Why should a local councils use ratepayer dollars to account for a, depreciate an 'asset' which they do not purchase, manage or have the authority to dispose of?

"And why do councils legally own these vehicles but not police cars or Fire & Rescue NSW pumpers?"

Mr Marshall said his Bill would amend Section 119 of the Rural Fires Act 1997 to transfer the ownership of all NSW Rural Fire Service vehicles and buildings to the NSW Rural Fire Service.

"This will ensure these assets are vested solely with the RFS, which will be required to account for these assets, and the associated depreciation and costs, on its books," Mr Marshall said.

"Currently the NSW Auditor General requires all local councils to do this, costing them a small fortune, or risk having their accounts qualified."

Last year 43 local councils had their accounts qualified for the 2021/22 financial year due to them not accounting for and depreciating all RFS assets in their local government areas on their books.

"The depreciation costs alone, cost each council and their ratepayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, which is money which could be better spent delivering services or fixing local roads," Mr Marshall said.

He said in the Northern Tablelands, more than $4 million annually would be saved if this Bill were to pass the Parliament.

"In essence, this Bill reverses a huge and archaic cost-shifting anomaly buried deep within the Act and puts the full cost back on the level of government responsible for the RFS; the State Government.

"There has been so much talk lately of the financial sustainability of local councils moving into the future, so this Bill has come at a perfect time.

"I hope the government and opposition support my Bill so we can resolve this dispute once and for all," he said.

Our journalists work hard to provide local, up-to-date news to the community. This is how you can continue to access our trusted content: